Live TVMarketsFinanceEconomicsIndustriesTechReal EstateSmall BusinessPoliticsVideo
Top SecuritiesDOW (DIA) $522.73 ▼0.37%S&P 500 (SPY) $769.36 ▼0.38%NASDAQ 26,185 ▼1.38%10Y 4.98% ▼7 bpBITCOIN $78,655 ▲0.83%NASDAQ 100 (QQQ) $715.34 ▼1.42%30Y MORTGAGE 7.24% ▼0.08
Friday, October 30, 2026 Edition · Raleigh 55° Mostly Clear Watch Live Sign in Subscribe
GENIUS EYEGET NewsA service of The GET Network, Inc.
Markets
Tech

Nontheistic humanist wins religious exemption from AI use at work

A University of Kentucky administrator secured a religious exemption from using AI at work based on humanist beliefs.

Oct 30, 2026, 1:19 AM By the Genius Eye newsroom (Tech Reporter) · Fact-checkedHow we report
Daderot / CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

David Durman, an administrator at the University of Kentucky, recently obtained a religious exemption from using artificial intelligence technology in his workplace, according to TechCrunch.

Durman identifies as a nontheistic Humanist, a belief system focused on human well-being and flourishing without reliance on a god or supernatural power, the article explained.

He approached the American Humanist Association, a nonprofit that promotes secular humanism, to explore legal protections that would allow him to avoid using AI at work, as he feels it conflicts with his beliefs.

Durman expressed concerns that AI diminishes critical thinking and moral agency by reducing the active application of the mind, which he views as essential for ethical behavior.

He also highlighted broader issues such as AI's impact on employment, environmental harm, and the threat to human creativity, which he believes are detrimental to culture and society.

Humanism, while not anti-religious, provides a scientific and moral framework for those skeptical of supernatural beliefs, as noted in the report.

Sources
  1. TechCrunch: You don’t need to believe in a god to get a religious exemption from using AI at work
We read public reporting and official data, confirm what we can, and write our own story. See something wrong? Request a correction.

Comments

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment